17.11.2023
The Paphos District Court recently decided a case involving the collapse of a house in the village of Armou , Paphos district, due to subsidence. The court awarded the plaintiffs €256,000, covering the purchase price of the house, plus interest and costs.
This case is considered unprecedented in Cyprus. The judge explained the responsibility of the state, emphasizing the duty of care on the part of public officials when they supervise the implementation of a court decision. The decision highlights the need to improve the system and strengthen controls in construction and licensing.
A British couple who bought the house in 2008 sued the construction company and the Republic of Cyprus. The Prosecutor General, according to Article 172 of the Constitution, is responsible for unlawful actions or inaction of officials. Responsibility was assigned to officials of the Planning and Zoning Department and the Paphos administration.
The court found negligence on the part of both government agencies. The Planning and Zoning Department failed to propose restrictions on residential development, despite geological problems, and the Paphos administration neglected due diligence and did not include the necessary conditions in the building permit.
The court concluded that both authorities were negligent and breached their duties under the relevant legislation. In accordance with Article 172 of the Constitution, the Republic of Cyprus is liable for prejudicial unfair acts or omissions of its officials. The decision emphasizes the responsibility of public authorities to ensure security and fulfill their obligations, setting a precedent for future cases in Cyprus.
